VISIT WEBSITE >>>>> http://gg.gg/y83ws?4974163 <<<<<<
Legalization of drugs can create tax revenues for the government. Based on the views of some economists, one of the beneficiaries of legalizing drugs will be the government.
They point out that once drugs like marijuana, cocaine and heroin are allowed to be distributed commercially, higher taxes can be imposed on these items, with the same range or higher as the taxes paid by manufacturers and distributors of cigarettes and alcohol. The amount of revenue, as estimated by the economists can reach billions of dollars. It can reduce government expenditures. Once these drugs are legalized on the streets, expenses from enforcing the law of drug prohibition will be eradicated.
Moreover, the state will not have to pay for court proceedings, prosecutions and sustenance of inmates incarcerated from unlawful drug use and sales. Legalizing the use of drugs will benefit the sick from pain. Marijuana is already allowed in some states for medicinal purposes and for some groups, the use of this drug will help thousands of people and even children who suffer from medical conditions. Cancer patients undergoing therapy and those who suffer from depression can benefit from the use of drugs such as marijuana through palliative management.
This can result to higher crime rates. An overdose on Lunesta can happen at approximately 90 times an intended dose. Many over-the-counter OTC and prescription medications can cause toxic liver disease. OTC pain relievers: Acetaminophen. The risks of medicines are the chances that something unwanted or unexpected could happen to you when you use them.
Risks could be less serious things, such as an upset stomach, or more serious things, such as liver damage. Main page Questions categories Philosophy and history Common philosophy Philosophy in education Philosophy and sociology Philosophy edu Students info Common articles Best philosophy topics. Take a look at the similar writing assignments Essay Is drug legalization a good idea?
Get a writing assignment done or a free consulting with qualified academic writer. Read also What is Kant's epistemology? What does Confucius say? Is Santa a God? And differences in enforcement across time or place bear little correlation with uses. This evidence does not bear directly on what would occur under full legalization, since that might allow advertising and more efficient, large-scale production. But data on cirrhosis from repeal of U. Alcohol Prohibition suggest only a modest increase in alcohol consumption.
To the extent prohibition does reduce use drug use, the effect is likely smaller for hard drugs than for marijuana. That's because the demands for cocaine and heroin appear less responsive to price. From this perspective, the case is even stronger for legalizing cocaine or heroin than marijuana; for hard drugs, prohibition mainly raises the price, which increases the resources devoted to the black market while having minimal impact on use.
But perhaps the best reason to legalize hard drugs is that people who wish to consume them have the same liberty to determine their own well-being as those who consume alcohol, or marijuana, or anything else. In a free society, the presumption must always be that individuals, not government, get to decide what is in their own best interest.
Skip to header Skip to main content Skip to footer Feature. And prohibition does, in fact, have huge costs, regardless of how harmful drugs might be. More from The Weekly Wonk Putin's Machiavellian moment What's different this time College and the common core.
Alec Baldwin was practicing drawing 'cold' revolver when he shot cinematographer. Rust Shooting. This is because the cartels wield so much influence in these areas that any acts of defiance simply result in unquestioned murder. The people of Mexico, and indeed in all of these countries, are tired of dealing with the unreasonable level of corruption throughout every level of their government. The United States could play a role in creating a more stable continent by working to cut these cartels off at the knees.
Of course, the United States is not the only market for drugs. But it is one of the closest and most voracious markets currently in existence. The drug violence that currently plagues Mexico is only a symptom of the larger problem. When in-demand markets are forced to go underground, violence becomes a part of the operation. But, this symptom is not limited to Mexico, Venezuela or Colombia.
The violence has not only spilled over as a result of cartel activity but it is inherent in the illegal drug trade in America on its own. Recently, a group called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition , have started to push for the end to the drug war because they believe that the war on drugs has only resulted in increasing violence between police and civilians.
This group is made up of former federal agents, police officers, prosecutors and judges who have first-hand knowledge of the devastation this violence causes both for law enforcement and for families. The group says that the war on drugs only makes every social problem that exists in the United States worse than it already is.
One of the biggest points the group wants to make is that the war on drugs has only perpetuated institutionalized racism in law enforcement. It also trains police officers, who are supposed to be protecting citizens, to go to war against civilians suspected of participating in the drug trade. LEAP also complains about what it considers to be overspending in the area of narcotics.
The group says that police and law enforcement are swamped by the number of non-drug related crimes. It says that police working on murders, burglaries and non-violent crimes do not have the staff or the funding to operate reasonably.
However, the narcotics squads remained both fully staffed and full funded. If drugs were legalized, there would be less of a need for groups and individuals to carry weapons of any kind to protect themselves against law enforcement.
If the police are no longer trained to go to war with almost 10 percent of the population, there would be less violence in the whole system and more help for those who need it.
Prison overcrowding is one of the biggest issues in the current judicial system but it does not get as much regular airtime as the offenders themselves. On average, federal prisons are overcrowded by a whopping 36 percent. Some of the most overcrowded prisons have seen figures as high as being 50 percent overcrowded.
Drug laws are a big factor in the number of prisoners that America sends away each year. Harsh drug laws and penalties were designed to deter people from using, selling or buying drugs in the United States. However, the minimum sentencing laws have not prevented more Americans from participating in the drug trade. Instead, these laws have resulted in a huge number of non-violent offenders being locked away in state and federal prisons.
The minimum sentencing laws also make it impossible to negotiate the sentence imposed on them. This means that more and more non-violent people are being locked up every year regardless of their personal situations or their behavior. These minimum sentences are not small. The time served by the average inmate in on a drug offence has reached 11 years.
Comments